Re: [jamboost] Re: standard include path added ?

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-09-03 20:56:02

Toon Knapen wrote:

> Rene Rivera wrote:
> 
>>Toon Knapen wrote:
> 
>>That might be related to the 
>>recent toolset changes I did. I added a SYSHDRS var to counterpart the 
>>existing STDHDRS var. You could try adding "STDHDRS = ;" into the 
>>toolset to clear out any global value it may have.
> 
> This works indeed but I do not understand why and how you changed this. 
> Are there compilers for which it is necessary to add an include-path to 
> their own headers ? And how do you decide this directory is 
> '/usr/include' (because this is not guaranteed to be the correct 
> directory) ?

Yes there are some compilers that need the include path. But the change 
is directly related to changing the default libraries from the compiler 
with different libraries. In this case that was for specifying STLport 
instead of the built in STL, but it can apply to any other set of 
standard libraries.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq