Boost logo

Boost-Build :

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (alexy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-04 19:10:57

David Abrahams writes:
> "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <alexy_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Folks,
>> To elaborate -- currently bjam doesn't output failed/skipped targets that
>> don't have associated actions. In cases when this happens, it makes the
>> task of using bjam log to reengineer the dependency chain (the task of
>> "process_jam_log" executable) impossible. A particular instance of this
>> situation can be observed in the current Boost.Python tests.
> I don't understand why a core bjam change was neccessary. Seems to
> me you could just add an empty action for the rule in question.
> No?

And who is going to track this down next time somebody adds a similar
rule to their bjam file?

Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at