Re: [jamboost] Re: Auto-link/common-variant-tag interaction broken

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (alexy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-11 19:08:11

Rene Rivera writes:
> Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
>> 
>> Given the current definitions of BOOST_VERSION in "Jamrules":
>> 
>> BOOST_VERSION ?= 1.32.0 ;
>> 
>> and BOOST_LIB_VERSION in "boost/version.hpp":
>> 
>> #define BOOST_LIB_VERSION "1_32"
>> 
>> I don't see how the current code in "common-variant-tag" rule
>> 
>> local version-tag = ;
>> if ! $(gUNVERSIONED_VARIANT_TAG)
>> {
>> local version-number = [ get-values <version> : $(properties) ] ;
>> version-number ?= $(BOOST_VERSION) ;
>> version-tag = [ MATCH "^([^-]+)[.]([^-]+)" : $(version-number[1]) ] ;
>> version-tag = $(version-tag:J="_") ;
>> }
>> 
>> can produce names matching the ones requested in "boost/config/auto_link.hpp".
>> 
>> The difference in the versions' format is bound to cause the former 
>> to return something like "whatever-toolsettag-mt-1.32_0" and "auto_link.hpp"
>> to request "whatever-toolsettag-mt-1_32".
>> 
>> Am I missing something?
>
> No, I was stupid and broke it :-(

Totally my fault, actually. You just didn't restore the previous
version fully. Fixed now.

-- 
Aleksey Gurtovoy
MetaCommunications Engineering