From: Johan Nilsson (johan.nilsson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-26 07:15:18
"Vladimir Prus" <ghost_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> On Tuesday 26 October 2004 15:28, Johan Nilsson wrote:
> > I've updated path.jam (attached) with path conversions from/to VMS
> > paths. The base version I used was from the first milestone 10 preview,
> > I figured no fixes were made to path.jam in preview 2.
> > I haven't put in any effort w.r.t. efficiency, but at least the tests
> > Comments are welcome.
> Your changes look very good. Even though I don't know anything about VMS I
> can't understand what's going on by looking at comment and the number of
> tests you've added is also impressive.
Thanks. I hope you mean "can understand", though ;-)
> I've committed your modifications.
> > Consider this only a first step in VMS support for
> > bbv2.
> I suppose getting compilers working is another step? Do you think we can
> "support for VMS paths" to developer-visible changes list for M10? Since
> change is completely safe for other platforms, I've included it already.
That should be ok, even though it's not really usable yet.
> > begin 666 path.jam
> > M(R @0V]P>7)I9VAT("A#*2!6;&%D:6UI<B!0<G5S(#(P,#(N(%!E<FUI<W-I
> If it's not very problematic for you, could you avoid using uuencoded
> and use attachments, as described in
> My mailer does not handle uuencode well.
I wasn't aware I was uuencoding ... does the attachment look better this time?
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk