Re: Clean up project-root.jam?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-19 17:24:26

Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>
>> The arguments about "Jam" prefix is definitely a valid one. It would have to
>> relearn this convention, but new users might benefit. Anybody else care to
>> comment on this UI issue? Should we use Jamroot or project-root.jam?
>
> I prefer files that have an extension. Don't really care that much about 
> the name though :-)
>
> Extensions make MIME types, CVS, editors, IDS, etc. behave reasonably.

Oh, good point. But then, we should change the name of Jamfile too.

file.jam

??? ;^)

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com