Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Tompa (tompa1969_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-16 04:11:22

Next message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [jamboost] Re: bjam rationale..."
Previous message: Tompa: "Re: bjam rationale..."
In reply to: David Abrahams: "Re: bjam rationale..."
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: bjam rationale..."
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: bjam rationale..."

David Abrahams <dave <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
> Here are some answers to the OP's question:
> http://www.boost.org/tools/build/v1/build_system.htm#requirements

Fine, thank you! But, hmmm... What is it in that list of requirements that bjam
does so much better than gnumake?

/Tompa

Next message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [jamboost] Re: bjam rationale..."
Previous message: Tompa: "Re: bjam rationale..."
In reply to: David Abrahams: "Re: bjam rationale..."
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: bjam rationale..."
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: bjam rationale..."

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk