Re: [jamboost] Re: propagation of usage-requirements

From: Toon Knapen (toon.knapen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-17 03:54:12

David Abrahams wrote:

> 
> Of course I agree with everything you have said. I am only arguing that
> the author of B should be able to be explicit about which of A's
> usage-requirements are propogated on to B's clients.
> 

Is there a use-case for this? I can't think of a usage-requirement that 
I do _not_ want to propagate to direct but also indirect dependents. 
Could you give an explicit example?