Re: Including 3rd party libraries with optional location

From: jim_at_[hidden]
Date: 2004-12-18 08:04:59

In article <200412181429.24113.ghost_at_[hidden]>,
Vladimir Prus <jamboost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>The code looks fine to me. I'll see why nothing is built on Monday.

Thanks for that. As you probably gathered, I'm not yet at the stage where
I'm confident that I'm doing the right thing.

>Are you using released m10 or CVS version? If CVS version then there's a 
>regression -- dependency scanning was broken on 2004-12-10 18:49 and fixed 
>back on 2004-12-16 15:37

m10 tarball off SourceForge. I'll try current CVS on Monday.
-- 
Jim Hague - jim_at_[hidden] Never trust a computer you can't lift.