From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-12-29 11:19:24
Alan Gutierrez wrote:
> I found it illuminating to read through the code in the kernel
> Boost.Build v2 employs an implementation of polymorphic classes
> that were built on top of the Jam syntax. It was really hard to
> figure out what is going since a lot of the constructs are not
> pure Jam, and not a description of a build process as one might
> For some reason, finding the lines between Jam, Boost.Build, and
> the toolsets makes me less anxious.
I really hope that kind of low-level detail isn't neccessary for
everyone. If it is, we really need to fix the documentation (well, I
already know we need to fix the documentation).
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk