From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-04 09:43:59
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> should Jamfile be always wrapped on <filename>, or not?
> For example, in:
> The Jamfile fragment below
> illustrates how these requirements might be specified.
> "Jamfile" is not in <filename>.
>From the tutorial:
When we refer to a “Jamfile,” set in normal
type, we mean a file called either
<filename>Jamroot</filename>. When we need to be more
specific, the filename will be set as
This is an example of the sort of confusion that could be avoided if we
didn't have a separately-named root file.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk