Re: bjam header dependency check broken (and so are the regression test reports)

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-16 12:50:15

Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
> Rene Rivera writes:
>> Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
>>> 
>>> Can we do something so that this doesn't get broken again in the
>>> future, though -- at least silently? Do we have tests for this?
>>
>> Yet another reason we want to switch to BBv2... It has tests.
> 
> How far away is it from being ready for the prime time?

Its functionality is nearly complete, I think. The documentation needs
a lot of work. But we can't know for sure until Volodya comes back to
regular participation here, which I guess was supposed to happen on the
10th.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com