From: Alexander Nasonov (alnsn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-18 12:01:02
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 January 2005 16:36, David Abrahams wrote:
> > >> ?? Why are the target names different in these two cases?
> > >
> > > It was a attempt to further simplify things -- the Jamroot can use
> > > arbitrary names for alias, for example
> > >
> > > alias filesystem : libs/filesystem//boost_filesystem ;
> > I understand now. I don't like the alias approach much.
> It surely saves on typing.
and probably can be used to unify names of alternatives like
glibc/ublibc or native-stl/stlport.
Just a thought of Boost.Build newbie.
-- Alexander Nasonov
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk