Re: [jamboost] Re: Python port: current status

From: Pedro Ferreira (pedro.ferreira_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-01-31 11:44:39

Olá João!

Em 31 Jan 2005, às 16:31, Joao Abecasis escreveu:

> Hi!
>
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>> - Jamfile parser
>>
>>
>> I'll see what I can do about it. Loading of project is highly 
>> dependent on
>> Jamfile parser, so I think it's the first thing I should do.
>
> Is there any interest in having the Jamfile parser written in C++, with
> the help of Spirit?

It would be an interesting exercise but I think that, in a transition 
phase, using bjam would be the simplest approach. When, and If, we end 
up implementing a parser, I'd vote for doing it in Python, just for the 
sake of using a single language throughout.

Cumprimentos,

Pedro