Re: [bjam, macos] from the boost-users list

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-02-28 10:57:04

Joao Abecasis wrote:
> I'm not sure wether this is the same issue, but I'm also getting bjam 
> Segmentation Faults, on a machine running linux.
> 
> On this machine, bjam currently segfaults with the quickbook toolset. 
> I've tried compiling bjam with gcc 3.3 and 3.4 and with the intel 
> compiler on that machine, all producing the same result. On a debug 
> build of bjam, gdb shows a backtrace of 168432 function calls (up to 
> main). Here's a portion:
[snip]
> On other machines I've tried all runs well without segfaults, including 
> the same executable that provided the above output. This could be the 
> execution stack is too small (?).

It's possible that it's a stack limit problem. I know I had a similar 
problem on OpenBSD where the process stack is set rather low. Have you 
tried increasing it?

--grafik