From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-05 12:13:21
David Abrahams wrote:
> This is all great, and I hate to be a spoilsport, but we really need
> to retire BBv1 and replace it with BBv2 before having any more fun
> with Python. I can't overemphasize how important this is!
Speaking of that.. I'm going to bring back the subject about file names.
I'm not particularly fond of Jamfile/Jamrules(.v2), etc. And it would be
nice if we could start "officially" moving Jamfiles to BBv2 to help the
So here's what I'm thinking:
1. Use "build.jam" as the project files, instead of Jamfile(.v2). The
name is short, direct to the point, and relates closely to Boost.Build.
2. Change the Jam load behavior so that if Jam is run as "b2jam" it
invokes BBv2, instead of "--v2".
Was there a resolution re: the "project-root.jam" file?
I know it's more changes but we really need to start moving the Boost
build files towards BBv2.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk