From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-03-14 13:23:43
Joao Abecasis <jpabecasis_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Joao Abecasis <jpabecasis_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>David Abrahams wrote:
>>>>in tools/quickbook/doc I did:
>>>> bash -c "export ICU_PATH=/cygdrive/c/src/icu && bjam -a --v2 toolset=gcc pdf"
>>>>But it continued to try to use vc7.1 until I moved
>>>> using gcc ;
>>>>to the top of my site-config.jam
>>>I had noticed this too... In order to have quickbook compiled only once
>>>quickbook is always compiled with the "default" toolset. In practice, we
>>>get an empty property-set:
>>> local quickbook-property-set = [ property-set.empty ] ;
>>>This is not the toolset specified on the command line but the first one
>>>ever defined. (<variant>release is also explicitly added which may not
>>>always be desirable...)
> I'm not sure how I can fix the above issue... The original motivation
> for choosing a single toolset was to avoid having multiple quickbook
> executables built for the sole purpose of generating docs.
> This design allows one to generate docs by specifying only the output
> format on the command-line:
> bjam --v2 pdf
> Quickbook, boostbook et al. are implementation details.
Fine. But why not respond when the user requests a specific toolset
> There may be other ways to select the "default" toolset but, given my
> limited knowledge of Boost.Build, I'm at loss here.
> Maybe the question could be which toolset an empty property-set selects.
> Should a toolset explicitly stated on the command-line take precedence?
>> Certainly *something* is making Cygwin GCC churn forever when it
>> compiles quickbook. Maybe it's the optimizer? Usually that sort of
>> thing is not the optimizer, but instead due to too much debug info
>> generated by templates...
> Under linux, the memory footprint (~100MB) and duration (2-4 mins) of
> quickbook compilation with gcc doesn't change significantly going from
> debug to release mode. With the intel compiler the memory footprint
> increases a bit more, from 100 (debug) to 150MB (release).
> I suppose Cygwin GCC should parallel plain gcc behaviour.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk