Re: Re: Purpose of BOOST_COMO_STRICT

From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-03 14:18:05

Rene Rivera wrote:
> Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
>> Rene Rivera wrote:
>>> Jonathan Turkanis wrote:

>>>> Also, does it cover "strict errors" mode as
>>>> well as "strict warnings"?
>>>
>>> Don't know. All I do know is that it's defined whenever the "--a"
>>> options is added.
>>
>> On Windows, --a mean strict warnings, and --A means strict errors.
>> Would it be consistent with the purpose of BOOST_COMO_STRICT
>> (whatever that is) to define it for strict errors, also?
>
> Yes. But since we don't add the "--A" option it a moot point ;-)

Okay, I never use --a, so I don't know much about it. I though it would cause
warnings in cases where --A would cause errors. But if Bronek's tests are just
running with --a (I can't view the command line now), that must mean that como
can't compile "windows.h" even with strict warnings.

Jonathan