Re: [jamboost] lib prefix on Unix

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-16 03:29:08

On Thursday 16 June 2005 12:23, ANDREW MARLOW, BLOOMBERG/ LONDON OF wrote:
> I am glad you are making this fix but please consider
> how to make the change in such a way that it doesnt
> break existing jamfiles by adding an extra "lib".

If this is an issue for *you* (or for any specific person) and will break your 
Jamfiles, and they are too numerous to adjust, I'll add the
backward-compatibility bits. I'm was hoping nobody would care ;-)

- Volodya

-- 
Vladimir Prus
http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com
Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2