Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-23 13:43:45

Next message: Malcolm Cifuentes: "Re: bbv2-build exe without building dependants"
Previous message: Jonathan Turkanis: "Why is --allow-multiple-definition used for the v1 MinGW toolset?"
In reply to: Jonathan Turkanis: "Why is --allow-multiple-definition used for the v1 MinGW toolset?"
Next in thread: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] Re: Why is --allow-multiple-definition used for the v1 MinGW toolset?"
Reply: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] Re: Why is --allow-multiple-definition used for the v1 MinGW toolset?"

Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to figure out why --allow-multiple-definition is used with
> MinGW, and all I can find on the subject is this:
>
> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-05/msg01373.html

To clarify: that's all I can find relating to Boost
and --allow-multiple-definition.

Jonathan

Next message: Malcolm Cifuentes: "Re: bbv2-build exe without building dependants"
Previous message: Jonathan Turkanis: "Why is --allow-multiple-definition used for the v1 MinGW toolset?"
In reply to: Jonathan Turkanis: "Why is --allow-multiple-definition used for the v1 MinGW toolset?"
Next in thread: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] Re: Why is --allow-multiple-definition used for the v1 MinGW toolset?"
Reply: Rene Rivera: "Re: [jamboost] Re: Why is --allow-multiple-definition used for the v1 MinGW toolset?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk