From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-24 15:11:01
Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>David Abrahams wrote:
>>>>Why? For people using older BB?
>>>I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "older BB", but my
>> A Boost.Build that isn't yet using the new SHELL feature.
> Ah, in that case, yes that's the reason.
>>>1. For people who only have access to a compiler which doesn't have
>>>popen and we don't have a prebuilt bjam available. They will follow the
>>>instructions and try to compile it, and fail. Not a good way to get started.
>> But if Boost.Build is using SHELL, the failure to compile bjam is just
>> the first of a long string of problems, no?
> Yes. But I can't commit the patch now as it has the potential of
> breaking for the 1.33 release which is an "older BB".
There are always branches.
> I'll be checking in something close to Craig's latest patch
> though. Now that it has a way to turn off the feature :-) (And I'll
> turn it on in the cases we know it works)
I would think we'd want to know sooner rather than later that it
wasn't supported, no?
Unless we only plan to use SHELL for "non-critical" features, I just
don't understand the point in making bjam build without it.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk