From: ANDREW MARLOW, BLOOMBERG/ LONDON OF (amarlow1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-27 08:12:45
it's a shame we can't take the guts of
the X11 utility, makedepend and put it into jam.
I know that jam takes several shortcuts when it calculates
the dependencies. makedepend does a full job
by expanding all the macros to figure out
what gets included.
----- Original Message -----
From: Vladimir Prus <jamboost_at_[hidden]>
At: 6/27 14:06
On Sunday 19 June 2005 02:21, David Abrahams wrote:
> David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >> David Abrahams wrote:
> >>> I have a case where changing a header file doesn't cause a rebuild of
> >>> the .cpp that includes it. Is there something in particular I should
> >>> try to help debug it?
> >> BBv1 or BBv2?
> > Sorry, v2. And I'm not sure I can repro this one anymore
> Well, it just happened to me again in a different context. It's an
> easy repro, too. Just go to libs/mpl/test and build the "set" target
> with your favorite compiler. Then
> touch boost/boost/mpl/set/aux_/set0.hpp
> Then build the set target again.
I suspect it's the same problem with includes via macro. Looking at
preprocessor output, it looks like line 36 of boost/mpl/set.hpp, that reads:
# include BOOST_PP_STRINGIZE(boost/mpl/set/AUX778076_SET_HEADER)
affect this case.
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2 Yahoo! Groups Links
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk