From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-06 01:02:07
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 09:27, Rene Rivera wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > I think I've implemented the logic needed for "bjam --v2 install" in
> > libs/whatever/build to work. It respects the same --prefix, --libdir and
> > --includedir options as top-level "bjam --v2 install" but only builds a
> > single library. (But installs all headers, of course).
> > Rene, now I have a question for you. In some libs, you've added this:
> > install dist-lib
> > boost_filesystem
> > <install-type>LIB
> > <location>../../../dist/lib
> > ;
> > Does the "install" functionality makes this unnecessary and I can safely
> > remove it? (Replacing with
> > boost-install boost_filesystem ;
> > )
> Yes. As the absence of those options in the subdirs was the only reason
> I added those targets.
> I think the only ones I currently rely on are the install targets in
> tools/Jamfile.v2. So I'll have to investigate if it's possible to get
> the equivalent just using "bjam --v2 install" and then those can also be
Ok, then I'll go ahead with removing "dist-lib" targets in the "lib"
directories, and will wait for you to comment on "tools/Jamfile.v2"
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk