From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-04 11:05:47
Vladimir Prus wrote:
Note: I'm resending this because my first post seems to have ended up in
the void somehow...
> On Thursday 04 August 2005 12:06, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
>>David Abrahams wrote:
>>>Markus Schöpflin <markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>>To my big surprise, I just discovered that defines are somehow not
>>>>propagated to dependencies, when using bbv1.
>>>Right. That's the way free features work.
>>>Feature, not bug ;-)
>>Thought so. But how am I supposed to build a full project where a define is
>>propagated to everything built? If you're asking for a use case: build
>>boost with -DBOOST_DETECT_OUTDATED_WORKAROUNDS.
> Excellent question ;-) Maybe building from top-level will help?
I did build from libs/test/test and was wondering that libs/test/src wasn't
getting the macro definition. Didn't try toplevel, though.
> Anyway, maybe we should reconsider our position and propagate <define>
> features to dependencies? After all, if <define> has no effect on
> dependencies, then it's harmless, and if it has some effect on dependency,
> maybe we should be building with the same value anyway.
I'm +1 on this.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk