Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-13 07:25:54

Next message: Philip Craig: "Re: Scons vs BBv2 (was: Qt: moccing of cpp sources)"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: Qt: moccing of cpp sources"
Next in thread: Kevin Wheatley: "Re: Scons users?"
Reply: Kevin Wheatley: "Re: Scons users?"
Maybe reply: Vladimir Prus: "Re: Scons users?"
Maybe reply: David Abrahams: "Re: Scons users?"

Hi,

On the Boost.Build list we were just discussing the fact that some
people otherwise inclined towards Boost have chosen Scons over
Boost.Build. It would be useful for us to understand some of the
reasons why, if some of you wouldn't mind letting us know. No flames,
please!

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Philip Craig: "Re: Scons vs BBv2 (was: Qt: moccing of cpp sources)"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: Qt: moccing of cpp sources"
Next in thread: Kevin Wheatley: "Re: Scons users?"
Reply: Kevin Wheatley: "Re: Scons users?"
Maybe reply: Vladimir Prus: "Re: Scons users?"
Maybe reply: David Abrahams: "Re: Scons users?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk