Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Alexey Pakhunov (alexeypa_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-15 13:34:07

Next message: Alexey Pakhunov: "[BBv2] Order sensitive features"
Previous message: Alexey Pakhunov: "Re: [BBv2] [msvc] scoping interest for other extensions"
In reply to: Reece Dunn: "Re: [BBv2] A new MS Platform SDK/StdLib selection method"
Next in thread: Andrey Melnikov: "Re: [jamboost] Re: [BBv2] A new MS Platform SDK/StdLib selection method"
Reply: Andrey Melnikov: "Re: [jamboost] Re: [BBv2] A new MS Platform SDK/StdLib selection method"

Reece Dunn wrote:
>>It is a collection of related headers, libraries, binaries. Minimal SDK
>>may contain only headers, for example - WTL. This can be an issue.
> How can this be an issue? In general, on Windows, an "SDK" has the
> following layout:

Well, I meant a bit different thing. I worried about header-only SDKs
but it turned out that we already have such SDKs (like some boost
libraries). So it was false alarm.

Best regards/Venlig hilsen,
Alexey Pakhunov.

Next message: Alexey Pakhunov: "[BBv2] Order sensitive features"
Previous message: Alexey Pakhunov: "Re: [BBv2] [msvc] scoping interest for other extensions"
In reply to: Reece Dunn: "Re: [BBv2] A new MS Platform SDK/StdLib selection method"
Next in thread: Andrey Melnikov: "Re: [jamboost] Re: [BBv2] A new MS Platform SDK/StdLib selection method"
Reply: Andrey Melnikov: "Re: [jamboost] Re: [BBv2] A new MS Platform SDK/StdLib selection method"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk