From: Andrey Melnikov (melnikov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-16 09:00:51
Reece Dunn wrote:
>>feature architecture :
>> # CLR CIL
>> # Java byte code
>> : propagated optional ;
> Do we even need the clr/java bytecode separation? Could we have
> <architecture>bytecode, and have .NET/Mono compilers generate CLR and
> Java compilers generate Java bytecode.
They are different bytecodes and different architectures. There's an
effort to make a PHP5 compiler to CIL. The same compiler/toolset could
potentially compile PHP5 into Java bytecode and native x86 and amd64
code too. So we need a way to select among them.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk