Re: [jamboost] Re: [BBv2] warning support

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-19 06:19:35

On Monday 19 September 2005 15:15, Reece Dunn wrote:

> > > number of warnings issued (especially by the msvc compiler)!
> >
> >Well, #pragma is they key for that compiler?
>
> There will be a lot of #pragmas, but that comes with the territory.
>
> > > In a previous incarnation, I had a 'default' value for warnings that
> >
> >would
> >
> > > be "the tool's default list of enabled warnings", but it was felt that
> > > default <==> on. I am happy either way as there are benefits to both
> > > approaches.
> >
> >Just as Alexey, I don't see any practical difference between "default" and
> >"on".
>
> Noted.

Ok, waiting for a new version of the patch ;-)

- Volodya

-- 
Vladimir Prus
http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com
Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2