From: Alexey Pakhunov (alexeypa_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-28 12:28:45
Zbynek Winkler wrote:
> those properties have no relevance to the pdf? I remember some time ago
> there was a discussion about marking some features (i)relevant. How did
> it end up?
Sorry, I didn't follow that discussion and I can't answer.
> IMO too. But what else can I do when I am given these options:
Can't you call it as 'pdflatex foo/bar/somefile.ext'?
> In addition to that it generates a lot of junk files in the current
> directory and expects to find them the next time it is run :(((
This is not a problem actually. Let's say the first call will create
foo.txt and bar.txt in bin/debug. The second time the tool will be
called in the same 'bin/debug' directory if the set of features remains
the same. So it will find foo.txt and bar.txt.
Best regards/Venlig hilsen,
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk