Re: [jamboost] Upcoming changes in default bjam output

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-07 09:40:07

David Abrahams wrote:
> I think we may need some small extension to allow the suppression of
> the executed commands for cases like the "run" rule that's used in
> testing: it's so ugly as to be unhelpful.

There's already the "quietly" modifier on actions. So by default you 
don't output the commands for those, and only output them when -d+2 is 
specified.

> If I don't hear loud objections in the next 24 hours, I'm going to
> implement this change and check it in.

My only note would be to make sure to add an option to shut the output 
off. Make uses "-s" for this. That way the non-users, like us, don't 
have to look at the output all the time.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org