Boost logo

Boost-Build :

From: Zbynek Winkler (zw-bjam_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-24 03:45:24

Reece Dunn wrote:

>If you, Volodya or anyone else has a better solution feel free to add it
>to the discussion.
The response files are "just a workaround" for a limited command line
length, right?

If this is true, would it be worth to consider just creating the
response file in the action? I mean that the response file would not be
a target at all, the build engine would never see it... The information
to create the rsp is already there and it would have the right semantic
(recreate the rsp each time the target is rebuild) and we could easily
keep the rsps around...


Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at