Re: [jamboost] Re: [BBv2] fix for response file regeneration

From: Zbynek Winkler (zw-bjam_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-24 03:45:24

Reece Dunn wrote:

>If you, Volodya or anyone else has a better solution feel free to add it 
>to the discussion.
> 
>
The response files are "just a workaround" for a limited command line 
length, right?

If this is true, would it be worth to consider just creating the 
response file in the action? I mean that the response file would not be 
a target at all, the build engine would never see it... The information 
to create the rsp is already there and it would have the right semantic 
(recreate the rsp each time the target is rebuild) and we could easily 
keep the rsps around...

Zbynek

-- 
http://zw.matfyz.cz/ http://robotika.cz/
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic