Re: [jamboost] Re: bjam Argument order

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-31 16:39:13

David Abrahams wrote:
> Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> 
>>Works for me...
>>
>>C:\DevRoots\Boost\boost\libs\python\build>bjam -sTOOLS=intel-win32-9_0 
>>-sPYTHON_VERSION=2.4 -sALL_LOCATE_TARGET=c:\tmp\build -n
>>-a exec.obj
>>...patience...
>>...found 652 targets...
>>...updating 17 targets...
>>MkDir1 c:\tmp
>>
>> mkdir "c:\tmp"
> 
> All that output doesn't prove much. My -n flag is being ignored. Are
> you saying that on your machine it just prints commands and doesn't
> compile anything?

Yes. In particular since I don't have the Intel compiler in question it 
would have errored if it tried to compile anything :-)

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org