From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-14 04:31:36
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Monday 13 February 2006 16:20, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
>> I reran the full regression tests and there is only one failure left now.
>> Seems like you need some actual declaration in there to make the warning go
> Yea, I've comitted a supposed fix.
I can confirm that the regression tests now all pass for tru64cxx. Perhaps
it's now time to do the renaming of the toolset.
> Now that V2 regressions are in shape, can you run C++ Boost regressions as
As a safety measure, I started with comparing the output of "bjam -a -n
-sTOOLS=tru64cxx71-006" with "bjam -a -n --v2 tru64".
I'm currently trying to make sense of the results...
> Thank you very much for the quick feedback! The toolset went from
> non-existance to fully working in less then a week, which is rather amazing.
Thanks YOU for the help to continue Tru64/CXX support.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk