Boost logo

Boost-Build :

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-14 04:31:36

Vladimir Prus wrote:

> On Monday 13 February 2006 16:20, Markus Schöpflin wrote:

>> I reran the full regression tests and there is only one failure left now.
> .....
>> Seems like you need some actual declaration in there to make the warning go
>> away.
> Yea, I've comitted a supposed fix.

I can confirm that the regression tests now all pass for tru64cxx. Perhaps
it's now time to do the renaming of the toolset.

> Now that V2 regressions are in shape, can you run C++ Boost regressions as
> per:

As a safety measure, I started with comparing the output of "bjam -a -n
-sPYTHON_ROOT=/opt/Python-2.4.1 -sPYTHON_VERSION=2.4
-sTOOLS=tru64cxx71-006" with "bjam -a -n --v2 tru64".

I'm currently trying to make sense of the results...

> Thank you very much for the quick feedback! The toolset went from
> non-existance to fully working in less then a week, which is rather amazing.

Thanks YOU for the help to continue Tru64/CXX support.


Boost-Build list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at