Boost-Build :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-22 10:30:28

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [Boost-build] [Repost] Boost.Build v1 broken?"
Previous message: Jürgen Hunold: "[Boost-build] [v2] memory-problems on win32"
Next in thread: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] GPL source in Boost"
Reply: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] GPL source in Boost"

Whoever regenerated the jamgram.h/jamgram.c files the last time used
bison instead of plain yacc, which means that we now have GPL'd source
in Boost. This problem needs to be fixed ASAP. I realize it doesn't
legally affect usability of Boost source, but it *does* cause major
problems for legal departments evaluating the usability of Boost.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [Boost-build] [Repost] Boost.Build v1 broken?"
Previous message: Jürgen Hunold: "[Boost-build] [v2] memory-problems on win32"
Next in thread: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] GPL source in Boost"
Reply: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [Boost-build] GPL source in Boost"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk