From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-10 11:45:18
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 15:52, David Abrahams wrote:
>> Rene Rivera <grafik.list_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > * Write a HASH builtin:
>> > rule HASH ( string : hash-method ? )
>> > That of course requires finding free code for at least one good hash
>> > function.
>> There's already a string hashing function built into the core of
>> bjam... so if it isn't good enough, I suppose we could just upgrade
> Yes, it's MD5, I believe. Speaking of hashing paths, I doubt it's a good
> solution. From user's perspective, long paths are just inconvenient, and not
> many users have problems because command length limits. Using hashes is just
> as inconvenient as long paths, IMO, because in both cases object files end up
> in directories with "funny names". Ideally, we need to create just "debug"
> directory for common cases.
I agree that it would be ideal.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk