Re: [Boost-build] bjam -f and BB v2

From: João Abecasis (jpabecasis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-05 06:52:15

Hi!

Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Sunday 16 April 2006 14:06, João Abecasis wrote:
>> João Abecasis wrote:
>>> +            echo " *** JABX *** Skipping next on " $(e) ;
>> Oops.. Looks like I forgot a debugging statement in there. Anyway, an
>> updated patch is attached to this message.
> 
> Hi João,
> this patch looks good. I believe you've a CVS write access, so please go ahead 
> and commit this patch.

Thanks for reviewing the patch. It is now in CVS-HEAD. Any other branch 
it should be applied to?

> BTW, it would be good if you run Boost.Build regression tests before checkin,
> by going to 'test' and running 'python test_all.py 
> some-toolset-you-have-configure'. If you're out of time, just let me know 
> when you checking this patch and I'll re-run tests locally.

I tried running Boost.Build regressions both with and without my patch, 
but I got lots of failures. The failures are the same, whether or not my 
patch is applied, so I checked it in anyway. I suppose it could be some 
missing configuration, but I didn't delve too deep into this. I'll post 
on this later.

I looked some more... I get failures with the system installed gcc-4.1 
and gcc-3.2 (this is mostly standard Fedora Core 5 install) and with 
intel-9.0. Vanilla gcc-4.1.0 and gcc-4.0.3 pass all tests. I'll look 
some more into the failures later.

Best regards,

João