Re: [Boost-build] Jam bugs

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-10 03:29:43

On Tuesday 09 May 2006 20:37, ANDREW MARLOW, BLOOMBERG/ LONDON OF wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Abrahams  <boost-build_at_[hidden]>
>
> > A rewrite provides a golden opportunity to put in some
> > support for FORTRAN. I know FORTRAN is ancient and horrible
> > but some systems still use it (don't ask). If jam processed
> > the include stmt found in FORTRAN source similar to the #include
> > of C/C++ this would hopefully be quite straightforward....
>
> You don't need a rewrite to do this.  The processing of #include is
> done by interpreted code.

Please use proper quoting when replying. The above text looked like you wrote 
it, while it's part of original reply from Dave.

> and include 'blah-blah.inc' can be done the same way...?

Yes, I believe I mentioned that fortran includes can be handled just fine last 
time that topic was brought up here, not so long ago.

- Volodya

-- 
Vladimir Prus
http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com
Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2