From: Jorge Suit Perez Ronda (josp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-17 10:30:06
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 16:36 +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Would you mind using different type for that, say:
> fortran_exe testf : ......
> ? This can be added quickly.
I think a kind of g77_exe that call g77 for linking would solve the
On other hand, gfortran.jam is not enough for compiling .f files with
g77, is it possible to include a g77.jam similar to gfortran?
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk