Re: [Boost-build] [BULK] Re: Bjam performance commentary.

From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-20 14:58:52

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-build-bounces_at_[hidden] 
> [mailto:boost-build-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Reece Dunn
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 3:53 PM
> To: Boost.Build developer's and user's list
> Subject: [BULK] Re: [Boost-build] Bjam performance commentary.
> Importance: Low
> 
> Sohail Somani wrote:
> > > [mailto:boost-build-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of 
> Rene Rivera
> > > 
> > > For those who are posting about the performance of bjam, 
> and ways to 
> > > "solve" the problems. I need to point out that you need to 
> > > ensure that 
> > > what you are proposing to fix is actually broken. Specifically at 
> > > minimum I expect people to look at the performance metrics 
> > > before saying 
> > > that some particular aspect of bjam is slow. Those are 
> available, as 
> > > documented, by adding "-d+10" option. For example:
> > > 
> > >    bjam -n -d+10 -a --v2 --builddir=C:/DevRoots/Boost/build 
> > > --prefix=C:/DevRoots/Boost/install "toolset=gcc-3.4.5_mingw_st
> > > lport51" "stdlib=stlport-5.1_gcc345" "variant=debug" 
> > > "threading=multi" stage
> > 
> > Still seems to be file system related though.
> 
> Time-wise, the slowest performers from a run I did were:

I've been running my own tests since this thread exited. Fast enough for
me.

Thanks for your help!

Sohail