From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-20 14:58:52
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-build-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-build-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Reece Dunn
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 3:53 PM
> To: Boost.Build developer's and user's list
> Subject: [BULK] Re: [Boost-build] Bjam performance commentary.
> Importance: Low
> Sohail Somani wrote:
> > > [mailto:boost-build-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of
> Rene Rivera
> > >
> > > For those who are posting about the performance of bjam,
> and ways to
> > > "solve" the problems. I need to point out that you need to
> > > ensure that
> > > what you are proposing to fix is actually broken. Specifically at
> > > minimum I expect people to look at the performance metrics
> > > before saying
> > > that some particular aspect of bjam is slow. Those are
> available, as
> > > documented, by adding "-d+10" option. For example:
> > >
> > > bjam -n -d+10 -a --v2 --builddir=C:/DevRoots/Boost/build
> > > --prefix=C:/DevRoots/Boost/install "toolset=gcc-3.4.5_mingw_st
> > > lport51" "stdlib=stlport-5.1_gcc345" "variant=debug"
> > > "threading=multi" stage
> > Still seems to be file system related though.
> Time-wise, the slowest performers from a run I did were:
I've been running my own tests since this thread exited. Fast enough for
Thanks for your help!
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk