|
Boost-Build : |
From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-22 12:52:02
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-build-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-build-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of
> Phillip Seaver
>
> What are you trying to accomplish? That might give us a
> better idea of
> what to suggest. Are you getting errors with that approach?
Basically what I'm trying to accomplish is have smaller atomic libraries
and others that can be built up as a permutation of these. The kink is
that a,b,c have symbols that should be exported (automatically, no def
file).
a,b,c are <link>static, and I can build combinations of them, but since
I want symbols to be exported, the easiest way is to use the object
files directly.
Alternatively, I also want to use a,b,c in exe's, so just like static
libraries.
If I use libs a,b,c directly in a shared object, the symbols wouldn't be
exported.
Does that make it more (or less) clear?
Sohail
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk