From: Andrei Melnikov (andy.melnikov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-29 11:05:43
On 27/06/06, Andrei Melnikov <andy.melnikov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 24/06/06, Reece Dunn <msclrhd_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Andrei Melnikov wrote:
> > > Patch version 2.
> > > - No cl.exe command line duplication any more, including compile.pch rule
> > > - Whitespace cleanup: tab fix from my previous patch, some trailing
> > > space removal
> > Very nice! I have applied this to my local BBv2 branch and built a project
> > without any problems. This has my vote :).
> Unfortunately, it doesn't work as expected. Full builds are ok, but
> incremental builds fail. I think it's because it's incorrect to invoke
> build rules with actions from other rules this way. Can someone help?
LOL... I just used -n switch for incremental build in VS... No wonder
that it didn't work.
Could someone test my refactorings under Cygwin and review the code
for possible flaws? I'm really afraid of checking changes in just
because "they just work", without multiplatform testing and a peer
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk