From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-13 11:20:59
On Thursday 13 July 2006 18:09, David Abrahams wrote:
> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > We've being though this before, and you basically agreed that this
> > comment is not accurate. Please see the attached message. This topic then
> > died.
> Do we need it to un-die, or do you think all the problems are
I think we need it to un-die. The two current issues are:
1. I've modified Boost.Python tests Jamfile.v2 to have <threading>multi. I
think that fixes the errors, but is not a clean solution. I'd prefer direct
linking to pthread.
2. I noticed that in V2 Boost.Python links to Python library. This sounds
potentially problematic, I'm not sure if Python interpreter will completely
hide all symbols from Python shared lib.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk