Re: [Boost-build] Milestone 11, release candidate 3

From: Bronek Kozicki (brok_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-15 04:15:36

Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> this is why I call it "insisting". Windows messages are sometimes a little
>> unreliable (IMHO) and if first message "misses" there is small chance than
>> next one will "hit" . Maybe it's needless, but it's also harmless.
> 
> Maybe you can say that messages are a bit unreliable right in comments. 
> Non-Win32 person like me might think they are always delivered.

they are delivered, but we do not have any guarantees for logic processing 
them in the message loop.

> Thanks, and looking for next patch!

I'm working on it :)

B.