From: Bronek Kozicki (brok_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-15 04:15:36
Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> this is why I call it "insisting". Windows messages are sometimes a little
>> unreliable (IMHO) and if first message "misses" there is small chance than
>> next one will "hit" . Maybe it's needless, but it's also harmless.
> Maybe you can say that messages are a bit unreliable right in comments.
> Non-Win32 person like me might think they are always delivered.
they are delivered, but we do not have any guarantees for logic processing
them in the message loop.
> Thanks, and looking for next patch!
I'm working on it :)
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk