From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-28 10:03:39
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Friday 28 July 2006 15:56, David Abrahams wrote:
>> >> In V1's sunpro-tool.jam, both <include> and <sysinclude> are mapped to
>> >> -I.
>> > Yes, but we never had Boost.Python (or much of Boost at all) working
>> > with Sun before. They've improved the compiler a lot and the error
>> > messages correspond to that kind of problem.
>> So do we have <sysinclude> capability in v2 yet, and is somebody going
>> to apply it to the SunPro toolset? I'm getting tired of seeing
>> everything failing for Python with Sun-5.8 when it's quite possible it
>> all could work!
> Are you talking about OSL-V4? Did you see the below message from Doug?
>> On Jul 12, 2006, at 7:15 PM, David Abrahams wrote:
>> > 2. There are no python headers installed in
>> > /usr/local/include/python2.3, indicating a likely tester
>> > configuration error.
>> Oops, there are no Python headers on this system. I've turned off
>> running Python tests for now.
Sorry, I did see it, but I forgot. Would it be sensible then to
delete the outdated sun-5.8 results?
(actually I'd much prefer if someone could just install Python
there -- it will be a little while before I can have SunOS up and
But I'd still like to know if we have <sysinclude> capability in v2.
Some other reports I saw indicated that it might be needed for SunOS.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk