From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-25 04:45:07
On Friday 25 August 2006 12:16, Ilya Sokolov wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 June 2006 16:26, Ilya Sokolov wrote:
> >>Andrei Melnikov wrote:
> >>>It's hard to review such large patches. I think it's better to
> >>>separate it into several smaller patches. I think you should at least
> >>>extract "minor non-functional code cleanups" into a separate patch. I
> >>>think such cleanups are definitely improvements, and the subpatch
> >>>should be applied immediately before the discussion of proposed
> >>><toolset>-cpp-pch framework can start.
> >>ok, see latest patches. line endings in pch.jam are broken, so i sent my
> >>version of this file instead of diffs.
> >>>P.S. Due to some reason, the attachments have Content-disposition:
> >>>inline, and gmail web interface (correctly) refuses to recognize them
> >>>as attachments, so I couldn't save them.
> >>sorry, i cant find any options in thunderburd to resolve this issue
> > Hi Ilya,
> > I'm sorry for letting this important patch hanging around for so long.
> > I'll get to it as soon as possible.
> > - Volodya
> no problem! thanks for your response.
> if you need, i can send you my project for testing. it builds 'fox' gui
> library under msvc, borland, dmc and mingw
That would be appreciated. In particular, we'll be able to measure how much of
performance boost that gives.
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk