From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-18 16:04:22
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > So, assuming we don't know about specific problems with Python, we should
>> > assume it's safe to link MT libpython into single-threaded library.
>> > I hope that's sufficient.
>> It is certainly sufficient for glibc and libstdc++, but not for
>> portable building on the "abstract machine."
> Since abstract machine does not have any compiler options, or libraries, it's
> not a useful point.
I didn't mean the C++ abstract machine. I meant the "abstract build
machine" (in quotes).
> At the moment we know that on gcc/libc of recent version, things
> should work.
> Do we know any other UNIXy system where single-threaded code can't call into
> multi-threaded library?
He referred you to SunOS.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk