From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-21 11:13:47
David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 00:09, David Abrahams wrote:
>>> >> Why not that, too?
>>> > Because I did not see obvious use case for that. And <threading>multi is
>>> > non-free so it can be passed via usage requirements anyway at the moment.
>>> ?? If it is non-free and can be passed via usage requirements, this
>>> exact capability would be useful.
>> Sorry, "can" should be "can't". Non-free features can't be passed via usage
> Why not?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk