Re: [Boost-build] Liking to pthreads

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-21 11:13:47

David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> On Tuesday 19 September 2006 00:09, David Abrahams wrote:
>>
>>> >> Why not that, too?
>>> >
>>> > Because I did not see obvious use case for that. And <threading>multi is
>>> > non-free so it can be passed via usage requirements anyway at the moment.
>>>
>>> ??  If it is non-free and can be passed via usage requirements, this
>>> exact capability would be useful.
>>
>> Sorry, "can" should be "can't". Non-free features can't be passed via usage 
>> requirements.
>
> Why not?  

No answer?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com