From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (agurtovoy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-23 11:43:34
David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Now that I look at explicit-failures-markup.xml, I'm reconsidering.
> Aleksey checked in an "expected failure" mark for each and every test
> with intel-7.1-linux and intel-8.0-linux.
The note says:
> The library is <a
> to work</a> in this configuration. The failures are
> due to configuration issues of the particular testing
> environment these tests have been run in. The
> regression runners and library developers are aware of
> the problem and plan to fix it for the next release.
> I don't know which developers Aleksey meant when he said they are
> "aware of the problem and plan to fix it for the next release," but I
> think we need to determine what those failures were and what the
> planned fixes were to be, and almost certainly we need to get this
> markup out of the XML file, because it's just masking problems.
> Dave Abrahams
> Boost Consulting
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
-- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk