Boost logo

Boost-Build :

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-29 03:26:53


Any help with this one?

Markus Schöpflin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently investigating the last remaining python test failures on the
> RC branch for the re-added HP TestDrive test runner.
>
> There are five failures left, and every single one of them fails with the
> following error:
>
> "/usr/local/gcc-3.4.4/bin/g++"
> -L"/usr/users/boost/opt/Python-2.4.3/lib/python2.4/config" -Wl,-rpath
> -Wl,"/boost/regression/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/python/build/gcc-3_4_4_tru64/debug"
> -o
> "/boost/regression/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/python/test/pointee.test/gcc-3_4_4_tru64/debug/pointee"
>
> "/boost/regression/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/python/test/pointee.test/gcc-3_4_4_tru64/debug/pointee.o"
> "/boost/regression/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/python/build/gcc-3_4_4_tru64/debug/libboost_python-gcc-gd-1_34.so.1.34.0"
> -lpthread -lrt -lpython2.4 -g -mieee -s
>
> deflate
> deflateEnd
> inflate
> inflateEnd
> adler32
> crc32
> deflateInit_
> deflateInit2_
> inflateInit2_
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> This looks like libz is missing from the linker command line.
>
> Interestingly, all of the failing tests either use the jam rule run or
> py-run. All tests using the rule bpl-test are working fine.
>
> And the toolset gcc-4.1.1_sunos_i86pc shows failures for the same tests,
> although the exact error is different.
>
> What is the intended difference between these two test rules? Why isn't
> there just one test rule? And does anyone know why it works in one case,
> but not the other?
>
> Thanks, Markus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-build
>


Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk