From: Markus SchÃ¶pflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-02 06:51:01
David Abrahams wrote:
> Markus SchÃ¶pflin <markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Ok, I think I understood that now. This difference probably results from
>> the fact that when compiling python at the TestDrive machine I linked libz
>> statically, but not when compiling at Comsoft.
> Oooh. Well, which one of those is standard?
No idea. There is no standard, probably.
>> Maybe I should change that, because the static libz will most probably not
>> be found by the link process, as it's not installed in a standard
> Heh, yeah. I'm not sure how the build system could figure out all the
> requirements for building against any particular Python installation.
> Maybe we should remove the -lz addition as well.
I removed that already. It gave my syntax errors anyway when trying to
I have recompiled and reinstalled python in the meanwhile. It took several
tries to remove the dependency to the static libz, but I think I have a
working configuration now. The regression test currently is running again,
hopefully it will show better results.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk