From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-28 09:51:22
Bojan Resnik wrote:
> 2006/10/28, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]>:
>> Bojan Resnik wrote:
>>> A recent change to stage.jam has removed the add-variant-and-compiler
>>> rule, which is used by jamfile of boost 1.33.1. Is it possible to keep
>>> this rule, perhaps written using the new tagging rules, because it is
>>> not possible to use boost 1.33.1 without it?
>> Yes the add-variant-and-compiler was removed... As for the rest you lost
>> me. The head code is 1.35. What do you mean by 1.33.1 and head?
> Sorry if I was not clear - I'm using bjam for all projects, and most
> of them need boost 1.33.1. Due to the removal of the
> add-variant-and-compiler rule, the projects do not build, and bjam
> reports an error in boost's Jamfile.v2 that the required rule is
> missing. I am not using CVS head of boost, but only of Boost.Build and
OK, I think I understand now. You changed the BOOST_BUILD_PATH, or the
boost-build.jam to use the current BBv2 to build with the Jamfile.v2
files that come with Boost 1.33.1.
Well I'm not fond of adding the add-variant-and-compiler back because it
means some code duplication that is prone to errors. Would it be
possible for you to replace the Jamfile.v2 from 1.33.1 with the one from
HEAD (and adjusting the version number)? -- Or the one from the 1.34 branch.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk